Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sid Curtis
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sid Curtis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A not notable person who is "best known for his upcoming role". With some minor jobs doesn't look to be notable yet. Those myspace, twitter and youtube sources reek of lack of proper career. feydey (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in complete agreement with the nom. The article's ledesection says volumes in its "The actor is unknown, but is waiting for his upcoming role". He may acheieve notability one day... but that day has not yet arrived. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I originally PRODed the article as an "Autobigraphical article for actor/model of questionable notability. No independent or reliable sources provided for reference, and the page is a recreation of a previously deleted page." In addition to that, the primary contributor seems to be Sid Curtis himself. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm generally in favor of keeping things if they're at all useful to someone, but this seems like nothing more than a gross PR ad to me. As stated above, lack of notability is mentioned in the article itself. SaintHammett (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.